Suno Admits Using YouTube Audio for AI Training—But Says the Labels Don't Have a Case

Suno just filed its response to the lawsuit from Universal Music Group and Sony Music Entertainment, and it's a mixed bag of admission and pushback.

Yeah, they're confirming that they scraped YouTube audio to train their AI model. No more dancing around that part. But here's where it gets interesting: Suno's legal team is arguing that UMG and Sony don't actually have standing to bring a "stream ripping" claim the way they've framed it. It's a technical move—questioning whether the labels are even the right parties to sue, not just whether what happened was legal.

This fight is shaping up to be less about whether Suno did something with protected content and more about who gets to say it was wrong and how. The labels have been aggressive on AI companies using their catalog without permission, but Suno's basically saying: "Yeah, we used YouTube. Now prove you own the claim."

The real question hanging over all this? As AI training and music data collide, the law hasn't caught up. Someone's going to have to draw the line between fair use and theft—and courts are gonna decide if it's the labels, the artists, or somebody else calling the shots.

Read the full story at Music Business Worldwide → https://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/suno-admits-it-obtained-youtube-audio-to-train-its-ai-but-challenges-umg-and-sonys-standing-to-bring-stream-ripping-claim/